Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://staging-repositorio.uprit.edu.pe/handle/UPRIT/37

Browse

Settings

Access type: UnknownSubject: search.filters.subject.Prisión preventiva

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Item,
    Incidencia de la Prisión Preventiva en el Hacinamiento cancelario en los penales Miguel Castro Castro y Lurigancho, distinto judicial de Lima Este, Enero - Diciembre 2017.
    (Universidad Privada de Trujillo, 2019)
    Arana Carranza, Edson
    ;
    Guillermo Alexander, Cruz Vega
    This work has been carried out with the purpose of analyzing the level of incidence of the Preventive Prison in prison overpopulation in Castro Castro and Lurigancho penitentiaries, in the East Lima Judicial District, 2017. The type of study according to the purpose that pursues basic , according to the descriptive research design, the quantitative method with documentary analysis is used The present study is based on the documentary analysis of the different statistical reports issued by the National Penitentiary Institute (INPE) and the National Institute of Statistics (INEI) in the period January-February 2017.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Item,
    La actuación del Ministerio Público, durante la investigación preparatoria influyen, en el vencimiento de los plazos, en procesos comunes con prisión preventiva, sin que exista acusación, en los juzgados del distrito judicial de Trujillo.
    (Universidad Privada de Trujillo, 2018)
    Vidal Carlin, Carlos Augusto
    ;
    Moreno Gálvez, Marco Antonio
    In the present investigation, it has been determined that the performance of the Public Prosecutor's Office in the preparatory investigation stage within the criminal process, significantly influences the non-compliance with the deadlines, the common processes with preventive detention, due to inefficiency and excessive procedural burden in the Judicial District of Trujillo, during the period 2017; posing as an alternative solution, a guide to criminal investigation procedures, based on an efficiency protocol.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Item,
    Imposibilidad de incorporación de nuevos elementos de convicción después de la presentación del requerimiento fiscal de prisión preventiva
    (Universidad Privada de Trujillo, 2018)
    Contreras Galarreta, Alejandrino
    ;
    Moreno Gálvez, Marco Antonio
    The present investigation entitled: "Impossibility of incorporation of new elements of conviction after the presentation of the preventive custody fiscal requirement", is the investigation into the possibility that the prosecutor's office after having already submitted his prison requirement reaches hearing and present more elements of conviction to sustain his prison, which is being done in practice and we have seen in the case of money laundering of "Fuerza Popular" of several defendants in the prosecutor's office has made use of it; to this we argue that this is not possible because such an act damages the right of defense by limiting the right of defense. In this sense, we make this work available where we pose the following research question: "What is the legal basis that underlies the impossibility of incorporating new elements of conviction after the presentation of the preventive custody fiscal requirement ?, to that problematic issue of real juridical nature we answered as follows: "The legal basis that underlies the impossibility of incorporating new elements of conviction after the presentation of the preventive custody fiscal requirement is given by the respect to the right to equality of arms and the effectiveness of the right of defense ", postulating as a general objective that of determining the legal basis that sustains the impossibility of incorporating new elements of conviction after the filing of the pre-trial detention fiscal requirement; we have considered as specific lines of investigation the following: analyze the measure of personal coercion of preventive detention and establish the scope of the principle of equality of arms and of the right of defense. Methodologically this is a descriptive dogmatic research, we will focus on investigating the problem at a dogmatic level.